a a a
Page: 1 2 3

Can Our Minds Change Our Brains?

Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain: How a New Science Reveals Our Extraordinary Potential to Transform Ourselves

By Sharon Begley
Ballantine Books 2007
285 pages, $24.95

In October 2004, Wall Street Journal science editor Sharon Begley attended a meeting in an improbable location on a seemingly equally improbable topic.  At the Dalai Lama’s private compound in Dharamsala, India, leading neuroscientists and Buddhist philosophers met to consider “neuroplasticity.”  The conference was organized by the Mind and Life Institute as part of a series of meetings, beginning in 1987, for brain researchers and Buddhist scholars to share insights into the workings of the mind and brain. The 2004 meeting set out to answer two questions: “Does the brain have the ability to change, and what is the power of the mind to change it?”  

In Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain: How a New Science Reveals Our Extraordinary Potential to Transform Ourselves, Begley reveals the results of that unlikely meeting, while making accessible the rapidly emerging science of neuroplasticity.  Although the title might suggest otherwise, Begley’s book is not a manual on brain exercises or the power of positive thought. Instead, it is a lively, largely scientifically accurate, and eminently readable view into the brain’s capacity for malleability.  Moreover, the book makes it obvious why the two seemingly disparate cultures of neuroscience and Buddhism share a mutual interest, as well as have much to learn from each other.

Neuroplasticity encompasses all of the things that nerve cells can do (or that can be done to them) to change the structure and/or function of the organ in which they are embedded, the brain.  Examples include the brain’s ability to Begley takes readers on a journey through how neuroscience’s view of the brain’s capacity for functional reorganization has evolved. add new nerve cells (neurogenesis), change the efficiency by which one neuron talks to another at sites of chemical communication (synaptic plasticity), and remap functional connections to allow for the outputs (axons) of one set of neurons to invade territory vacated by another set of axons.  All of these processes, which take place in full force while the brain is initially assembled in utero and during the early years of life, are now known also to occur, to some degree, throughout the life span.  This latter type of neuroplasticity is at the heart of the meeting held in Dharamsala and of Begley’s book—not just the nuts and bolts of how brains effect this plasticity, but its implications for who we are today (vs. yesterday) and our potential to become something else tomorrow.  

Discovering Neuroplasticity

The interface of Western science and Buddhist philosophy provides the context for considering these implications.  In order to build a bridge between the two disciplines, Begley takes readers on a journey through how neuroscience’s view of the brain’s capacity for functional reorganization has evolved. She highlights the theories and discoveries of many of the field’s leading investigators. Included are the famous late-nineteenth-century psychologist William James; the father of cellular anatomy of the nervous system, Santiago Ramón y Cajal; and modern experimental neuroscientists such as Nobel laureates David H. Hubel, M.D., and Torsten N. Wiesel, M.D., who elegantly demonstrated the sensitivity of cerebral cortical neurons to visual experience during “critical periods” of early brain development.  Begley implicitly makes the point that the emphasis on such limited windows of opportunity for functional brain reorganization may have contributed to researchers’ initial reluctance to embrace the growing body of evidence for neuroplasticity in the mature brain. 

But then she goes on to describe a growing list of research that demonstrates this neuroplasticity, such as the discovery by Michael Merzenich, Ph.D., and Jon Kaas, Ph.D., that the part of the cerebral cortex that processes tactile information is altered after training or when sensory input from a part of the body is removed. The case for lifelong neuroplasticity becomes even more compelling as Begley reports the identification by Fred H. Gage, Ph.D., of neurogenesis in the brains of adult mammals. The reader will be intrigued to learn that many of the insights into the capacity for adult neuroplasticity came from unexpected quarters. For example, lifelong neuronal renewal was first established in songbirds, and the initial observations of human adult neurogenesis came from cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy with drugs that serendipitously allowed visualization of newly generated neurons when their brains were examined by microscope upon autopsy.

Page: 1 2 3

Comments

Duality nature of brain line by dentate gyrus resonance oscillations

Sankara Velayudahn Nandakumar

8/21/2009 9:15:02 AM

I consider if found broken as libidinal disturbances in love life might be in evidence, in otherwords, it may be a symbol of unsatisfied libido leading to female-male of sex-linked dual inheritance. This informs a connection between the external and internal internal unconsciousness leading to a double life sometimes in case of persons having dual brain lines, lower line indicating a feminine tendencies and upper line a dominant male tendency. This double brain line is stimulated by lunar waxing and waning stimulated on lower and upper brain lines.

The dentate gyrus may also have a functional role in stress and depression. amage to the dentate gyrus can play a role in déjà vu. New neurons are hyper-excitable, firing at the slightest stimuli and forming connections with each other; more mature nerve cells, on the other hand, are more discriminating. This hair-trigger response allows newborn brain cells to link events and memories that happen around the same time, a phenomenon called pattern integration the role of young neurons in the dentate gyrus, but this one is the first to convincingly bring together neuron physiological properties and knowledge about the structure and anatomy of hippocampus tissue. This requires a black crystal-moon stone helium-neon laser biostimulation study on jump over resonance dynamics.

By labeling newly formed brain cells with a fluorescent marker molecule, researchers can track how neurogenesis affects the animals' ability to perform pattern integration tasks Unfortunately, many of the connections of the monkey and human dentate gyrus have yet to be investigated. One example of a projection that has been studied in both species is the commissural connection. While cells of the polymorphic layer (mainly the mossy cells) give rise to a very robust commissural projection to the molecular layer of the contra lateral dentate gyrus in the rat, this projection does not exist in the nonhuman primate brain or in the human brain. As connections of the primate and human dentate gyrus are better studied, it is undoubtedly the case that there will be other fundamental differences that will affect not only normal function but also pathological processes.

This raises the caveat that while the rodent dentate gyrus is an extremely valuable tool for evaluating function and potential mechanisms of pathology, caution must be exercised when these results are extrapolated to the human dentate gyrus from that of monkey by Simian line and the deviations as brain line separated by heart line the Mongolian along the path of human evolution, who will loose control and often commit crimes doubly exaggerated by clubbed thumb.There seems to be disturbance from the second to first and finally towards fourth quadrant of Saturn is observed. Jump resonance criteria of nonlinear control systems Magneto optic quantum sector of space with reference to hologram source split up for resonance jump over resonance and symmetry breaking sector for phase drifted quantum band widths: Sankara Velayudhan Nandakumar on behalf of cape Institute of Technology, Nagercoil formerly with NSK Engineering college, Nagercoil, as research scholar, Anna University with Hubble space research committee.

Teaching to encourage neurogenesis

Maria Leaver

5/17/2007 3:15:06 PM

For some time now I have been reflecting on what it means to be a teacher in the 21st century. How do we as teachers contribute and indeed put into practise this new awareness of the brain's plasticity. What are the optimal conditions for mind/brain change? How could we, should we teach? Thoughts from Tasmania, Australia